How are conflicts between player agents and players typically settled?

Conflicts between player agents and players are primarily settled through mediation or legal arbitration. This method is often employed because it provides a structured environment for both parties to address their disagreements with the assistance of a neutral third party. Mediation allows for a collaborative approach where the player and the agent can express their concerns and work towards a mutually acceptable resolution. If mediation doesn't yield results, legal arbitration can serve as a binding process, where an arbitrator makes a decision based on the facts presented.

Negotiation sessions, while they can also be useful, may not always lead to resolution, especially if the parties involved have significant disagreements or if emotions run high. Team management intervention is typically focused on organizational aspects rather than mediating conflicts between agents and their players. Discussions among fellow players, although insightful, do not usually have formal authority or the structured outcomes necessary to resolve agent-player conflicts effectively. Thus, mediation or legal arbitration is the most reliable avenue for resolving such disputes, ensuring that both parties adhere to contracts and maintain professional relationships.